Len,
Thanks for all this testing. I don’t know about the ins and outs in Calamares.
Calamares
I put up an Ubuntu with it, not knowing:
1 - If it could be done
2 - If it would break something else
3 - If it would be reliable
This is why it is in the experimental
directory and has no user application in it. I put it up thinking you are right about Ubiquity being so slow, and that I might try to do something about it. I would not put efforts in adding all users applications while testing. This is the easy part that can be done later, once a setup is declared viable.
Some explaining
Keeping it as small as possible saves time while preparing, while building and while uploading as well, as I can’t use a tool remotely anymore on a build server : the one I used before, “Customizer”, is no longer maintained by anyone, I had no news from Kamilion, its last developer, who was from the West part of the States, since the Covid period
, and now the only one left which I find usable enough is Cubic, which is only graphical, so no remote building : I have to do with my personal computer at home.
You can compare to what’s inside a full fledged Bento Openbox edition : https://linuxvillage.org/en/blog/2025/01/04/bento-openbox-remix-24-04-1-en/
(I’ll put back Libreoffice-draw later, as per your say, but as said before, you can add whatever you need using the Synaptic package manager, and / or the Gnome Software Center if your computer can handle the additional weight on the resources).
Todo
About the password, in Calamares, I didn’t know, (didn’t pay attention) but this should be reason enough to send a bug report somewhere, and ask them that they had a feature to be able to check what characters have been typed in.
Debian Live editions with Calamares
You might want to compare with a Debian edition that makes use of Calamares currently, the lightest being the one with LXDE, and just above in lightness, Xfce, very nice to have:
LXQT should be good too, I have tested the QT versions of LXDE. Here is the collection:
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current-live/amd64/iso-hybrid/
(Hard to find from the main Debian page… There are sooo many choices!
)
Please let us know if you test one, and if it behaves better in a Debian Live edition, especially on the matter of languages. If it does, I can investigate to find what package I might have missed : it is possible that the tool reflects what language packs are installed or not installed, my habbit, when building experimental versions, being to remove as many packages as possible as long as it does not break the system.
We can still have 32bits versions for them, but we need to start with a Debian 11 version and update from there. I did that in Virtualbox recently. (For another job going on with Debian).
About install parties and repair cafes
- We can figure ways to make it more efficient and faster to install distributions
- We will need feedback with technical information on brands and models taken care of
Is that something which is already done, or only the number of units repaired and their weight is collected? If it is not, would it be possible to collect such information, along with the month and year it is done?
Other tests and rebuilts going on:
I have been working continously during several days to put up an antiX core with the SysVinit services manager (the old way, before SystemD, that is less efficient for recent computers but muuuch lighter for old ones, hence the name of the distribution).
There is an experimental edition in the experimental
directory, now. What I have noticed when trying to install the last version built, is the installer behaves in a way I was not used to, even when I did Bento editions a few years ago. I’ll have to dig deeper about that, and ask help on the antiX forum.
After a few minutes, here is my post at the antiX forum, requiring information on the installer partitioner tool https://www.antixforum.com/forums/topic/bento-antix-23-2-experimental-is-out-issues-with-partitioner-in-installer/
I could not follow up the last two years, because I went back to school. I did a work-study period to obtain a diploma in computing, so no way I could do anything extra.
This said, it is desirable to have an easy to use antiX editon:
- We can have 32bits versions,
- They are branded to be the lightest, from the start,
- They can be rebuilt as many times as we want, using the ISO Snapshot tool inclueded
(which is easy enough to use)
Many people put up respins of their own and get help on the antiX forum on the way.
What I look for:
- have them look nice and not geeky (light colors, colorful, backgrounds, icon theme, windows theme, GTK theme, compliancy with QT themes and applications… and ease to change using Graphical tools)
- have them come with a graphical tool to install / remove packages and do updates
- have them come with a large choice of packages
Large choice of packages : Debian is the champion in this matter, antiX started using the Debian repositories since 2012.
Going down the memory lane
After about 16 years rebuilding distributions, using dedicated tools, I can say most which come with a set of uncomplicated rebuild tools can allow to be done within a few days.
When I started, it was not so easy, because from the start I always wanted them to be the lightest for old computers while the easiest for end users. And I was a complete beginner in the matter, so I had to rely much more on the help of the community and the buddies.
Trying with PCLinuxOS current editions, (The official one was KDE3, by striping them, as the other members of the community were doing, led me nowhere, I always ended breaking it, until one guy (who the founder of the distribution disliked, for reasons I never understood) built one core ISO, very tiny, from where I started. It had taken me 3 months of hard work on a daily basis to make it good enough for the community to be able to install it, test it, and provide feedback.
2 years later, we had versions in 32bits and 64bits, one of each fully in English and fully in French, one of each small base editions (around 300 MB) and some full (less than or around 700MB all possible to burn to CD), plus a set of “Edu” versions made with the feedback from parents in different countries : all based on the “Openbox made easy” recipe.
Then I had to quit, because the leader went on vacation for a year, leaving the community to the care of his assistants : who kicked out everybody doing stuff and bringing invaluable tech improvements (some of them were really good tech people! While the assistants were not so much… ). The boss came back one year later, un-banished everybody, but by that time we had created linuxvillage.org dedicated to all distributions.
There are still traces of that time, here and there. https://pclosmag.com/html/Issues/201109/page01.html
and screenshots here : https://pclinuxos-fr.org/captures-decran/ (I was the author of the Openbox versions only, the other ones were done by buddies who wanted to have them fully in French by default).
About 32bits editions :
- They can be installed to 32 and 64bits capable machines alike
- The RAM will be limited to 3 GB (In a machine where there is 4GB, the system seens 3.56 or so),
- It will run faster than 64 bits on computers with limited CPU capability and limited RAM, typically core 2 duo CPUs, and computers which can’t use more than 2 or 4 GB RAM.
Conclusion on the ongoing builds
All that said, now it is easier to rebuild some distributions in a matter of days, not months or years, and experimental means it’s a Work In Progress! ^^
So please, feel free to ask for lists of desired packages for the coming versions, meanwhile let’s see how it goes with Calamares and with 32bits versions of the distributions which can still provide them.